• Current Reads

      Life after Life Jill McCorkle
      This Is Your Captain Speaking Jon Methven
      The Starboard Sea Amber Dermont
      Snark David Denby
      Bring Up the Bodies Hilary Mantel
  • Popular Tags

  • Recent Reflections

  • Categories

  • Moleskine’s All-Time Favorites

  • Echoes

    sumithra MAE on D.H. Lawrence’s Why the…
    To Kill a Mockingbir… on [35] To Kill A Mockingbird…
    Deanna Friel on [841] The Price of Salt (Carol…
    Minnie on [367] The Rouge of the North 怨…
    travellinpenguin on [841] The Price of Salt (Carol…
    travellinpenguin on Libreria Acqua Alta in Ve…
  • Reminiscences

  • Blog Stats

    • 1,040,400 hits
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,728 other followers

  • Advertisements


btt button

I checked in at the Booking Through Thursday blog, which is the host for a weekly book meme or blogging prompt. Here is this week’s prompt:

I think most of us are probably against censorship on principle, but … do you think it should vary depending on the impressionable age of the readers? Or is it always wrong? How about the difference between ‘official’ censorship by a government or a school system, as opposed to a parent saying No to a specific book for their child?

When I started high school, the school district made a step forward to remove Lolita, Lord of the Flies, and Crime and Punishment from the censorship list. Surprisingly, some parts of the country now seem to go backward with an even more extensive banned book list in school. You can read this comprehensive list of banned books that shape America. I suppose since schools are buying the course materials, they have the right to the extent of what should be purchased.

The greater responsibility shall befall parents, who are and should know if their children are ready for sensitive materials. Certain books are not suitable for readers until they reach a particular level of maturity—but this line is difficult to draw because each child is different. Parents should know what their children are ready for and that they should be supervising their readings.

Racism, homosexuality, offensive language, sexually explicit scenes, gritty topics like suicide and drugs, and talking animals, are all listed as valid reasons for challenging books. When it comes to young adult fiction, though, there’s another reason: all the books appearing on the list have been deemed ‘unsuited for age group’. I believe that teen books should not be banned. Teens also deserve the right to choose what to read and what not to read. Too often teenagers are treated like fragile, vulnerable people who need to be protected and shielded from everything horrible in the world. This is not the case. Teenagers may have developing minds, but books help to shape it. Imagine our new generation being blinded to issues in homosexuality, racism, and global violence because some cowardly conservative bigots decide the teens shall be led astray, the future of society is grim.Do we want to raise kids in an unrealistic bubble?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: